I did look at the patch anyway and I think we have a little problem here. This patch removes copyrights from the source code (mine and other folks contributed to xmlsec). From legal point of view this means that OO can not use xmlsec at all.
Best, Aleksey
Aleksey Sanin wrote:
Even worse. Since Andrew and other guys did not submit their patches back I can not even look at them. Because otherwise I might write some code that looks too close to what they are doing :(
Aleksey
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 01:32:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And watching the source it seems it does a lot more than that.
I'd say they are so many changes I don't think a user encountering problems with
their version could expect correct support directly from Aleksey.
that's why I'm worried, it looks like a fork... Red Hat ships xmlsec1 we also ship OpenOffice.org, and I think we will try as much as possible to use only one version, and possibly drop the Oo.o patches unless they can be justified and merged in the main stream.
Daniel
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
