Not sure where you've got these uris but these are the uris that xmlsec supports (taken from specs):
https://git.gnome.org/browse/xmlsec/tree/src/strings.c Aleksey On 8/19/13 7:59 AM, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > Hi, > > while testing a perl implementation of xml-dsig I found some problems > with URI's. > > Could it be that xmlsec only supports sha1? I have been trying to verify > rsa-sha512 and signatures and sha-256 digests. Maybe I have the wrong URI's? > > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha512 > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha256 > > By testing the perl implementation against some live data from working > federations I found more URI issues. Should Canonicalization be given as > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315# > or > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315 > > The only difference is the missing hash tag. Xmlsec allows only the one > without hash tag. But libxml2 will only output with hashtag. > > For Transform xmlsec requires the hashtag > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n# > But refuses the version without hashtag. > > Could some please enlighten me? Which URI's should I use and why? > Which digest and signature algorithms does xmlsec support? > > Thanks > > /Ulrich > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlsec mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec > _______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
