Thank you Aleksey for pointing me to the correct URIs. /Ulrich
2013/8/19 Aleksey Sanin <[email protected]> > Not sure where you've got these uris but these are the uris that > xmlsec supports (taken from specs): > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/xmlsec/tree/src/strings.c > > Aleksey > > On 8/19/13 7:59 AM, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while testing a perl implementation of xml-dsig I found some problems > > with URI's. > > > > Could it be that xmlsec only supports sha1? I have been trying to verify > > rsa-sha512 and signatures and sha-256 digests. Maybe I have the wrong > URI's? > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha512 > > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha256 > > > > By testing the perl implementation against some live data from working > > federations I found more URI issues. Should Canonicalization be given as > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315# > > or > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315 > > > > The only difference is the missing hash tag. Xmlsec allows only the one > > without hash tag. But libxml2 will only output with hashtag. > > > > For Transform xmlsec requires the hashtag > > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n# > > But refuses the version without hashtag. > > > > Could some please enlighten me? Which URI's should I use and why? > > Which digest and signature algorithms does xmlsec support? > > > > Thanks > > > > /Ulrich > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > xmlsec mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec > > >
_______________________________________________ xmlsec mailing list [email protected] http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec
