On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:36:12PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>
> And Tiago, it was not coupled that tightly.
Well, just look at the head of xf86pciBus.c (before RAC be removed and when the
old PCI code was in place):
#ifdef HAVE_XORG_CONFIG_H
#include <xorg-config.h>
#endif
#include <ctype.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <X11/X.h>
#include "os.h"
#include "Pci.h"
#include "xf86.h"
#include "xf86Priv.h"
#include "xf86Resources.h"
/* Bus-specific headers */
#include "xf86PciData.h"
#include "xf86Bus.h"
#define XF86_OS_PRIVS
#define NEED_OS_RAC_PROTOS
#include "xf86_OSproc.h"
#include "xf86RAC.h"
It was mix of RAC + PCI + BUS + high level screen informations + X protocol +
real-mode things and etc, and you're saying that that code was not coupled?
So I _really_ don't know what you mean about tightly, coupled and confusing
code...
Tiago
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
