Dan Nicholson wrote:
> A type xf86Bool has been added to support an optional boolean. This is
> more of a tri-state where the boolean is invalid if it hasn't been set
> yet.
A nit: Why not xf86Tristate?

More general: If we go that far in the server, why not connect this to
input device properties as well? Are there any plans?

Cheers,

Simon

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to