On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Simon Thum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> A type xf86Bool has been added to support an optional boolean. This is
>> more of a tri-state where the boolean is invalid if it hasn't been set
>> yet.
> A nit: Why not xf86Tristate?
>
> More general: If we go that far in the server, why not connect this to
> input device properties as well? Are there any plans?

Those are both reasonable suggestions to me. I didn't have any plans
to use this type in more than the patches I supplied, though.

--
Dan
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to