On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:49:21 +1000, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bonus point - CheckPassiveGrabsOnWindows suddenly becomes a lot lesss > complicated. Yeah, and makes it far more obvious that it's following the spec. > Keith, I'll leave that in your court, please apply to master as you see fit, > I won't include it in my pull requests to avoid duplication. This looks pretty good; I'll review it with the protocol spec, but I'd like to also know if you happen to have run the test suite over the new code? -- [email protected]
pgpWJLI5rJukF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
