On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:04:57PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:49:21 +1000, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Bonus point - CheckPassiveGrabsOnWindows suddenly becomes a lot lesss > > complicated. > > Yeah, and makes it far more obvious that it's following the spec. > > > Keith, I'll leave that in your court, please apply to master as you see fit, > > I won't include it in my pull requests to avoid duplication. > > This looks pretty good; I'll review it with the protocol spec, but I'd > like to also know if you happen to have run the test suite over the new > code?
no, not yet. I'm still battling with the test suite on my virtual machines and on an older box. once I have a suitable installation, I'll likely post the xtest logs but at this point I cannot offer this yet. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
