On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:57:57 +1000, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm a bit torn between the two - evdev feels right but the server is >> "better". > > Let's stick it in the server. That's the piece that needs to > differentiate between hal and udev anyway.
But the major point of the InputClass work is that you no longer have to differentiate between the config backend. The .conf snippet works for hal or udev. Now you can just install your driver and .conf file and not have to worrry about the server (so long as there's some active config backend). -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
