Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:39 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <vigna...@freedesktop.org> > wrote: > >> But if we go for it, we're going have an implementation that "exceeds" >> the protocol. Is that valid? > > Sure, there's nothing saying that we have to be able to not provide > certain extensions in the sample implementation; the core X protocol > just isn't useable by the bulk of X applications these days without some > of the 'standard' extensions.
Render would not be the first always-built extension in the X.Org implementation. SHAPE & XKB were similarly unifdefed in the last couple of release cycles. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel