Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:00:39 +0300, Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> But if we go for it, we're going have an implementation that "exceeds"
>> the protocol. Is that valid?
>
> Sure, there's nothing saying that we have to be able to not provide
> certain extensions in the sample implementation; the core X protocol
> just isn't useable by the bulk of X applications these days without some
> of the 'standard' extensions.
Render would not be the first always-built extension in the X.Org
implementation. SHAPE & XKB were similarly unifdefed in the last
couple of release cycles.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
