On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:23:32AM +0300, Oliver McFadden wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 01:55 +0200, ext Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > Matt, > > > > On 05/26/2010 04:12 PM, Matt Dew wrote: > > > Ok here's a summary of current changes: > > > > > > 1) I used kernelnewbies.org as the template, so this page doesn't look > > > like the xorg wiki. (probably least important diff), > > > > I guess you can remove "XOrg" from the top and let only the logo there. > > > > Another issue to worry about is regarding the wiki engine. Is MoinMoin > > good enough for us? I'm totally dumb regarding these technologies but we > > should choose one easily to upgrade, maintain, customize, etc. > > (I'm just jumping into the middle of the conversation, so my apologies > if I have missed something.) > > It's been a long time since I've looked at wiki software, but I remember > the search engines being terrible except on MediaWiki. > > MediaWiki also has a lot of cool features, is well maintained > (Wikipedia...), and has support for 3rd party extensions: > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AllPages/Extension: (unorganized > list, but you get the idea.)
We've had this discussion a few times already. Bottom line is - the wiki engine can be perfect but if the content is crap the wiki is worthless. I can see how setting up a new wiki would be more exciting than polishing the existing content into shape, but that doesn't really address the issue. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
