On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 06:34 +0200, ext Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:23:32AM +0300, Oliver McFadden wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 01:55 +0200, ext Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > > Matt, > > > > > > On 05/26/2010 04:12 PM, Matt Dew wrote: > > > > Ok here's a summary of current changes: > > > > > > > > 1) I used kernelnewbies.org as the template, so this page doesn't look > > > > like the xorg wiki. (probably least important diff), > > > > > > I guess you can remove "XOrg" from the top and let only the logo there. > > > > > > Another issue to worry about is regarding the wiki engine. Is MoinMoin > > > good enough for us? I'm totally dumb regarding these technologies but we > > > should choose one easily to upgrade, maintain, customize, etc. > > > > (I'm just jumping into the middle of the conversation, so my apologies > > if I have missed something.) > > > > It's been a long time since I've looked at wiki software, but I remember > > the search engines being terrible except on MediaWiki. > > > > MediaWiki also has a lot of cool features, is well maintained > > (Wikipedia...), and has support for 3rd party extensions: > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:AllPages/Extension: (unorganized > > list, but you get the idea.) > > We've had this discussion a few times already. Bottom line is - the wiki > engine can be perfect but if the content is crap the wiki is worthless. > I can see how setting up a new wiki would be more exciting than polishing > the existing content into shape, but that doesn't really address the issue.
Right, that's true. I would suggest switching over to MediaWiki at some point though. This could of course be after cleaning up the docs. -- Oliver. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
