Twas brillig at 12:58:22 06.06.2010 UTC-07 when [email protected] did 
gyre and gimble:

 AC> For patch 8: While the change isn't wrong, I'll leave it up to one
 AC> of the XKB maintainers to decide if introducing a FatalError()
 AC> where there was none before (Xprintf -> XNFprintf) is the right
 AC> thing to do.

There was segfault instead down the road if Xprintf fails.

-- 
  http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/

Attachment: pgpNUaUeBczP2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to