Twas brillig at 03:04:05 07.06.2010 UTC+07 when [email protected] did gyre and gimble:
AC>> For patch 8: While the change isn't wrong, I'll leave it up to one AC>> of the XKB maintainers to decide if introducing a FatalError() AC>> where there was none before (Xprintf -> XNFprintf) is the right AC>> thing to do. MG> There was segfault instead down the road if Xprintf fails. Actually there was no segfault due to uninteresting set of checks and side-effects of various functions which made the code of ddxLoad.c so ugly and hard-to-read. I am preparing a better patch. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgp33Bb33GU2W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
