Le 16/07/2010 17:10, Tiago Vignatti a écrit : > Seems we're mixing the MITSHM and HAS_SHM defines a bit also. Perhaps just set > an option to disable all shm access is enough for us? Note that currently > --disable-shm is a misname; should be --disable-mitshm, or --disable-xmitshm > or something like that (concerning the extension only).
With all the cleanups done these past few months, are there *any* supported arches where SHM isn't available? If not, why even bother keeping all those defines in the server? Just wondering... Cheers, Rémi _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
