Twas brillig at 18:14:48 24.07.2010 UTC+02 when [email protected] did gyre and gimble:
>> Seems we're mixing the MITSHM and HAS_SHM defines a bit >> also. Perhaps just set an option to disable all shm access is enough >> for us? Note that currently --disable-shm is a misname; should be >> --disable-mitshm, or --disable-xmitshm or something like that >> (concerning the extension only). RC> With all the cleanups done these past few months, are there *any* RC> supported arches where SHM isn't available? Cygwin/Win32? Just wild guess. -- http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgp0HeZrbyhy7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
