On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 22:27 +0200, Simon Thum wrote: > Am 16.08.2010 21:41, schrieb Chase Douglas: > > Also, we think that there's a case to be made for environmental gestures > > that should override gestures recognized by clients. This is provided by > > the mutual exclusion flag when selecting for events. Again, this > > wouldn't be possible without integrating it into the X propagation > > mechanism. > I like it, if only because it resembles what I described on the list > earlier that year :) The protocol's probably tricky to get race-free, > but surely worth it. I'll have a more thorough look at it this week. > I'm cc'ing florian in case he's still working on the issue.
Here's the old discussion: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-March/006388.html Thanks for mentioning, Simon - I'm very excited to see this, it's really quite similar to my own work. Douglas, allow me to point you to my thesis from last year at http://mediatum2.ub.tum.de/node?id=796958 Chapter 3 in particular deals with very similar issues, I'd be happy if you could give it a quick glance and tell me about your opinion. Or did you already read it? The similiarities, as I said, are quite striking :-) There also is a cross-platform implementation of my concepts available at http://tisch.sf.net/ and https://launchpad.net/~floe/+archive/libtisch . One thing I would suggest as a future extension is something along the lines of less monolithic gestures, i.e. compose them out of still smaller primitives such as number of fingers, held time, pressure, distance change, angle change etc. etc. Florian _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
