Am 18.08.2010 23:02, schrieb Chase Douglas: >>> The common ancestry is traversed from child windows to parent windows to >>> find >>> the first window with a client selecting for initiation of the gesture >>> primitive >>> comprising the touches. The first window meeting this criteria is the normal >>> event window. >> I think that normal window deserves a definition of its own. > > I'm not sure I follow? The normal event window is just a regular window I just wanted to say that layout-wise, it should be more clear that there is an important definition there. E.g. by putting it in the definitions section.
> It's gesture specific because it may vary even among the same gesture > type. Think of a rotation gesture. It may be performed by moving two > fingers around a pivot point halfway between the two. The focus point > would thus be that pivot point. A rotation may also be performed by > rotating one finger around a stationary finger. The focus point would be > under the stationary finger in this case. > > The point of the focus coordinates is to give context to the clients > about the gesture. For rotations, a client will need to know at what > point to pivot. For pinches, a client will need to know at what point to > zoom at. To sum up, it's semantically gesture-specific, but protocol-wise it's not. IMO Peter's wording is fine. >>> The timeout value is implementation specific. >> (Having 5 ms here doesn't count...) > > Can you give more detail? I'm not sure what you are getting at. Henrik and Peter said what I wanted to address here - no need to restate. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
