On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 17:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:45:57 +1000, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > You got my vote, anyway. And given the amount of candidates and how tight
> > the race is, that vote may just give you the edge ;)
> 
> Sounds like we have a winner! Managing the stable branch (and the master
> branch, for that matter) is largely a mechanical process of watching the
> incoming patches, waiting for them to be adequately reviewed and then
> applying them. If Ajax can check the hw/xfree86 patches and provided
> 'Acked-by:' lines, I think we'll be in good shape here.

I'm happy to manage the xf86 ddx bits of 1.9.x.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to