On Aug 23, 2010, at 08:24, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 17:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:45:57 +1000, Peter Hutterer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You got my vote, anyway. And given the amount of candidates and how tight >>> the race is, that vote may just give you the edge ;) >> >> Sounds like we have a winner! Managing the stable branch (and the master >> branch, for that matter) is largely a mechanical process of watching the >> incoming patches, waiting for them to be adequately reviewed and then >> applying them. If Ajax can check the hw/xfree86 patches and provided >> 'Acked-by:' lines, I think we'll be in good shape here. > > I'm happy to manage the xf86 ddx bits of 1.9.x.
Thanks! =) _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
