On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:37:57AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:53:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > Looks like a sufficiently trivial change, but what system still using > > gcc 2.95 does anyone care about running modern X.Org on? > > > > I have to repeat this every time I send a patch for gcc 2.95... :)
you could add it to the wiki and then shout at them for not RTFW :) on that note, didn't we have a wiki page that lists the required compiler features? Can't seem to find it anymore. Cheers, Peter > OpenBSD still uses it on a few legacy architectures on which later gcc > versions are having problems. > > Among those sparc (32 bits)[1] is the most intersting because the > Xorg server runs pretty well on it, even on multi head configurations. > > The other architectures still using gcc 2.95 and on which OpenBSD is > actively maintained are m68k, m88k and vax. the Xorg server isn't built > on them for various reasons. > > [1] http://www.openbsd.org/sparc.html > -- _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
