On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:37:57AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:53:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: > > Looks like a sufficiently trivial change, but what system still using > > gcc 2.95 does anyone care about running modern X.Org on? > > I have to repeat this every time I send a patch for gcc 2.95... :)
In fairness, it is rather unintuitive that an allegedly supported OS/architecture combination must have the absolute newest X server, yet hasn't managed to update its compiler in just over 11 years[0]. Cheers, Daniel [0]: 9 years, if you're being kind and counting 2.95.3.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
