On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:40:22 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > What's this bit about freetype: > FreeType 2.2.x breaks versions of libXfont before 1.2.0, and all > current versions of fnttosfnt. > libXfont 1.2.0 is 4 years old..
> Is this still relevant? The line suggests freetype-2.1.x ... I'd been > shipping 2.3.x without problem and have been using 2.4.x for a while. > Is this just old news that should be punted? Should we suggest > freetype-2.4.2 or later (to match CVEs)? Do we need to put out a > release of fnttosfnt to fix it? Is there an open ticket somewhere? A > quicksearch for "fnttosfnt" in bugzilla turned up nothing. > Looking at git it seems this might have been fixed by b651f24b766c9e76dec8a14c68623f4b7fa68141? How old is the information in the wiki? > > Someone better understanding mesa should update the mesa line. My > guess is that we should just say mesa 7.2 or later: > > Mesa 6.5.2 (or git master/head, if building the Git master/head X.Org > code). To build GLX support into the X server you must have a copy of > the Mesa source available at server build time, and you must tell the > server where to find it with --with-mesa-source=/path/to/mesa at > configure time. Mesa 6.4.1 is required for xorg-server 1.0.1. Note > that Mesa 6.4.1 and 6.4.2 will cause compile errors when building > X11R7.1. Mesa 6.5 will work (for 7.1; make sure you have 6.5.2 for > building 7.2). > • Note especially that for using MESA's current GIT/master > version (which becomes 7.1), you will need the GIT/master > version of xorg-server (which becomes 1.5). 1.4-branch does not > work. More information on building DRM kernel driver and MESA + > DRI drivers at DRI wiki. > This part has changed quite a bit... Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
