On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]> wrote: > It would be nice to have reusable module list. I am trying to convince > Trevor about that.
I'm concerned about your wording; I hope I haven't come across as being opposed to or resisting your ideas on this matter. With regards to the module list, my understanding is that there are two issues: 1. what is the complete list of possible modules I could build for a given platform (e.g. linux-i386) 2. can the user provide a list to the build script of just the modules they want to see built "build.sh -L" provides you with the answer to #1. I have a patch to provide the functionality of #2, but I'm waiting to see what happens to the patch I provided a couple hours ago (perform arbitrary git or make commands) and the patch you provided to create subdirectories inside util/modular before submitting it. Additionally, the functionality of #2 uses the list of #1 to make sure the modules are built in the correct order irrespective of the order in which they're provided. > And if we were to have common module list, they perhaps should be in a > separate dir. The list of modules (and their order) inside the build.sh script isn't entirely static. It changes depending on which platform you are building for. So the list wouldn't be a static file, but rather would need some logic to be generated correctly. As I've said, "build.sh -L" provides you with this list. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
