-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On Sep 22, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Not even compile-tested, but probably pretty close. OS maintainers
please to be building.
The FreeBSD backend is the only one that stands a chance of working on
non-x86, the rest appear to not have _any_ facility for I/O port
access
on other arches.
We (NetBSD) actually do have this facility since ~forever, it's in use
on most powerpc ports, shark and so on. Otherwise we couldn't use
things like Voodoo3, ct65550 on macppc or any shark onboard graphics
chips in X.
What a pity. Also, none of these have appear to have any facility
for domainful I/O, so, that won't work either. Meh.
Whatever you mean by that. If you mean support for more than one PCI
host bridge with associated goo we have that as well.
If I post patches will they be ignored again?
have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQEVAwUBTJqDNcpnzkX8Yg2nAQJqjQf8COpo9of3qJy3pFebJtsZVpo0CPvflS3g
z2phSvys+Wc7GILwzuV8DgZ4UFuLdOKvQUSGy56uGznlK4yD7/ruwXoyg04XRBWz
32qHJsAAkg/Ib1sQ8gSRxnUnF9XMxP/s+8OTZqftC8Wix6IJQc71dwcMmEvosKaI
UiiTUEudW5xjHLPnw7aEuhPQmWa2/UUlnb9nuND7hYxiUXzQLPcJbUTzi/Ops7g3
wY/kao4CXFodZBLfZ0OuQ8T7+ammsj2S8Jp/eYjoW49UpN0s8Jbcj5KIyGb23OAp
vQ5FO6kS39Vrv7C5gU29tLM8fkS1NiLGwSyg+Ml746zuoQ5aXVs23Q==
=4gEe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
