On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:11 +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:52:30AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 22:48 +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > > As we learned on XDS, this sort of, what others would call, basic > > > diligence, like testing some graphics drivers first, would only be > > > reserved for drivers which would've been merged back into the server > > > tree. > > > > You're putting words in people's mouths there. You can stop doing that > > any time now, it's getting a bit tiring. > > I am not sure whether Michael Larabel already made the audio or video > recordings of the "xserver 1.10 planning" session available. The above > is the interpretation that i made of some of the statements made during > that "discussion".
I believe you're conflating "changes that break the build of merged drivers will not be pushed" with "drivers merged in the server are the only ones that matter" which, okay, that's a pretty standard comprehension failure for you I suppose. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
