On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:51:27PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 22:48 +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > > > As we learned on XDS, this sort of, what others would call, basic > > > > diligence, like testing some graphics drivers first, would only be > > > > reserved for drivers which would've been merged back into the server > > > > tree. > > I believe you're conflating > > "changes that break the build of merged drivers will not be pushed" > > with > > "drivers merged in the server are the only ones that matter" > > which, okay, that's a pretty standard comprehension failure for you I > suppose. > > - ajax Please re-read the above and your subsequent statements. Your first statement does indeed say: we are free to push changes which break drivers, without taking responsibility for unbreaking those drivers. Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
