On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:35 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > I once tried to clean up all the inline, __inline, __inline__, _X_INLINE > declarations but never actually got an answer which one I should use. > The documentation says that inline is an optional extension and that one > should use _X_INLINE. But too much code already assumes that the > compiler supports inline. Is everyone fine with that?
They'd better be. AC_C_INLINE should have been handling this for us at any rate. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
