Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> I once tried to clean up all the inline, __inline, __inline__, _X_INLINE
> declarations but never actually got an answer which one I should use.
> The documentation says that inline is an optional extension and that one
> should use _X_INLINE. But too much code already assumes that the
> compiler supports inline. Is everyone fine with that?
I'm fine with either the C99-standard inline or _X_INLINE (which should
resolve to the same) - I'd rather see the __inline & __inline__ obsolete
gcc extensions go away in favor of the standard form.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
