On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Chase Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/17/2010 04:04 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:59:30PM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote: >>> I haven't reviewed the protocol specification changes yet, nor have I >>> performed any code review. >> >> Yeah, I should've removed your S-o-b/R-b tags from the significantly >> changed parts -- my bad. > > I'm actually not quite clear what should happen when patches are > co-developed. SOB is a statement that the code may be incorporated under > the license of the project, so I always thought that the SOB may remain > after further modifications since the code is still incorporable. The RB > tag should probably be removed though.
In the kernel, I've seen Co-authored-by: tags. Google points me here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=451880 It's not the best, but it implies that you had more to do with the patch than reviewing it or giving it the thumbs up or whatever. -- Dan _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
