On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: > > On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > >> - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. > >> - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. > >> - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. > >> - Performance loss seems about 5% instead of the previous 33%. > > > > As you've lowered the performance loss number again, I assume you mean > > 'high throughput' above. :) > > I really mean low latency at low throughput (typing for example), [...]
That was always covered by the BlockHandler. Your problem was only due to the BlockHandler not getting called for a long time (and/or the driver not flushing properly in its own BlockHandler). -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
