2011/2/11 Maarten Maathuis <[email protected]>: > 2011/2/11 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: >> On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:44 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >>> 2011/2/10 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: >>> > On Don, 2011-02-10 at 20:15 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >>> >> - It turns out that part of the problem was actually on the driver side. >>> >> - The performance loss is not worth the small visual improvement. >>> >> - This should ensure low latency at low throughput. >>> >> - Performance loss seems about 5% instead of the previous 33%. >>> > >>> > As you've lowered the performance loss number again, I assume you mean >>> > 'high throughput' above. :) >>> >>> I really mean low latency at low throughput (typing for example), [...] >> >> That was always covered by the BlockHandler. Your problem was only due >> to the BlockHandler not getting called for a long time (and/or the >> driver not flushing properly in its own BlockHandler). > > Even before i read this i got the idea if i shouldn't triple check if > I'm trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist anymore. So i'll do > some more testing. Maybe a revert is even in order. I made a mistake > once, i don't want to make a second one on top of that :) >
It seems that the appearance of large amounts of text scrolling over the screen depends on how high the throughput is, it seems a bit stupid to slow things down for the sake of appearance, plus it's very possible other people won't see it like I do due to a slightly faster or slower system. I'll probably sent a revert later today or tomorrow. >> >> >> -- >> Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com >> Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer >> > > > > -- > Far away from the primal instinct, the song seems to fade away, the > river get wider between your thoughts and the things we do and say. > -- Far away from the primal instinct, the song seems to fade away, the river get wider between your thoughts and the things we do and say. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
