On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:55:13 +1000, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> > wrote: > >> There were a few times during the last cycle where patches didn't get merged >> but for no apparent reason. A simple email to the list stating something >> like "I'm unavailable for this week and won't be merging patches" would be >> enough to know what's going on. > > Yeah, more communication is definitely better. I'm also trying to be > pro-active when things seem ambiguous, not letting patches linger in an > undefined state, but I do end up getting side-tracked by other > activities on occasion. I'll let you know if I plan on getting pneumonia > again too.
I'd rather you let us know when you have pneumonia ;-) or are sucked into the Intel maw. like if you have a laptop and can get an email out and have outstanding merges for > 1 week, send a mail to xorg-devel. Dave. _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel