On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:39:15 -0500, Adam Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> The rule I've sort of had in mind for protocol changes is something > like: the protocol and client library must have official releases before > any xserver release candidate can release that implements them. Given that they don't have any defined release schedule, that should be pretty easy to manage. Of course, getting any *review* for protocol changes is nearly impossible as it's so hard to understand how stuff works when using a language other than C. > The only extension for which I could forsee that being onerous would be > GLX, but GLX has one foot in the grave anyway. It was pushed! -- [email protected]
pgpRnxq9WaEnD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
