On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:50 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 09/15/11 05:57, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > > A couple of things to verify: > > > > * OpenBSD still uses libtool 1.5 > > So does Solaris - 1.5.22, though I have a local install of 2.2 > I usually use for building X.Org modules from git.
Off topic. Any plan of using libtool v2 in the near future? These are the 2 O/S I know of which prevent v2 from being the minimum required version. OpenBSD does not have v2 at all, but they have a libtool replacement in the works. > > I don't think that's an issue though, as -module has worked fine > for us for many years - it's already used for several modules in > the xserver tree: > > hw/xfree86/dri/Makefile.am:libdri_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version > @LIBDRM_LIBS@ > hw/xfree86/dri2/Makefile.am:libdri2_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version > @LIBDRM_LIBS@ > hw/xfree86/i2c/Makefile.am:bt829_drv_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version > [and many more in that file] > > > * Solaris is different enough to get a review for this > > Also see no problems here, as noted above with the modules that > use it and work fine. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
