On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 May 2012 15:34, Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Didn't think i needed to do so myself. There is this split between how >> individual X components are being handled, apparently. I only committed >> to my own unichrome driver, and thought that the maintainer of apm or >> the X.org release manager would be the only one allowed to commit to apm >> these days. > > That's only for the server really, and components with actual > maintainers too. apm hasn't had a maintainer (or a developer) since > XFree86.
I'd also be surprised if it had a user. Dave. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
