On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:13:54PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1 May 2012 15:34, Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Didn't think i needed to do so myself. There is this split between how > >> individual X components are being handled, apparently. I only committed > >> to my own unichrome driver, and thought that the maintainer of apm or > >> the X.org release manager would be the only one allowed to commit to apm > >> these days. > > > > That's only for the server really, and components with actual > > maintainers too. apm hasn't had a maintainer (or a developer) since > > XFree86. > > I'd also be surprised if it had a user. > > Dave.
Still. I changed the ABI/API, and at the same time i went round all users and either fixed them up or disabled the call. Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
