On 05/20/12 04:54 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <[email protected]>
cvt.c currently says:
/*
* I'm not documenting --interlaced for obvious reasons, even though I did
* implement it. I also can't deny having looked at gtf here.
*/
Are those reasons no longer valid? (Sadly they're not obvious to me.)
At the very least a patch to document --interlaced should remove the comment
claiming it's intentionally undocumented, preferably explain why the change
in intentions has been made.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
