On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 04:37:48PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 05/20/12 04:54 AM, Alon Levy wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <[email protected]> > > cvt.c currently says: > > /* > * I'm not documenting --interlaced for obvious reasons, even though I did > * implement it. I also can't deny having looked at gtf here. > */ > > Are those reasons no longer valid? (Sadly they're not obvious to me.)
Missed that, sorry for the noise. I don't know either. Please ignore the patch. > > At the very least a patch to document --interlaced should remove the comment > claiming it's intentionally undocumented, preferably explain why the change > in intentions has been made. > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] > Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
