Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> writes: > I left the first patch as-is because it's easy to cherry-pick to 1.12 this > way. I also left the xf86BlockSIGIO() calls in though I don't think outside > of the ddx actually uses them. We can probably drop them, either this cycle > or the next.
I like the whole series, except where OsReleaseSignals confused me. For the series: Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpeKJ1KdYdhJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
