On 10 July 2012 03:02, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > If failing to disable a protocol specified by -nolisten failed, we'd > throw a FatalError and bomb startup entirely. From poking at xtrans, it > looks like the only way we can get a failure here is because we've > specified a protocol name which doesn't exist, which probably doesn't > constitute a security risk.
It kind of is if the protocol you specified has a typo in it. > > And it makes it possible to start gdm even though you've built with > --disable-tcp-transport. Wouldn't it be better if disabling tcp wotked even in this case? Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
