And so may be why I do not find similar issue on my Ubuntu platform. From: Zhigang Gong [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:18 PM To: He, Junyan; 'Michel Dänzer' Cc: 'Alex B'; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Glamor] glamor with xserver > 1.12
Junyan, I found I made a mistake when I tried glamor with latest xserver. I forgot to update dri2proto, so the xserver was not built with DRI2 support and thus triggered this bug. I updated the dri2proto and rebuilt everything, then this bug just simply disappears. From: glamor-bounces+zhigang.gong=linux.intel....@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:glamor-bounces+zhigang.gong=linux.intel....@lists.freedesktop.org> [mailto:glamor-bounces+zhigang.gong=linux.intel....@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Zhigang Gong Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:32 AM To: He, Junyan; 'Michel Dänzer' Cc: 'Alex B'; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Glamor] glamor with xserver > 1.12 I tried it. Glamor does start successfully with the xserver latest git master version. Although it seems there is a regression when start FC17 with it. After a quick analysis, it should be a texture cache pool related bug. Junyan, if you have time, please look at this bug and try to fix it. Thanks. It's should be easily to reproduce. Use latest git master xserver, latest xf86-video-intel and start gnome-session on a FC17 distro. Then look at the top-right panel's battery/volume icons, you may see some incorrect output, and if you disable the fbo pool cache, then it can fix that problem. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of zhigang gong Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:12 PM To: Michel Dänzer Cc: Alex B; Zhigang Gong; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; He, Junyan; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Glamor] glamor with xserver > 1.12 Oh, Really? That's a great news for me, I will have a try tomorrow. But To be honest, even it works, such dependencies is still an issue. And I'm afraid it may break the indirect GLX's context somehow. As the GLX server side may have a different gl dispatch table from the mesa's. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:40 +0800, Zhigang Gong wrote: > > -----Original Message-----
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
