On 31 July 2013 17:25, Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> wrote: > What is this patch against? I don't see those AC_CHECK_FILE calls in > the xserver git repo, nor in xf86-video-intel. Doing a grep across all > the git clones I have suggests it could be xf86-video-mach64, -mga, -qxl, > -r128, -savage, -sis, -tdfx, -xgi or -xgixp.
Hm, forgot subject-prefix didn't I, sorry. xf86-video-matrox. Keeping it real. :) > As for the patch itself, why not use PKG_CHECK_EXISTS to set the default if > the required modules ([libdrm >= 2.0 xf86driproto]) are present? Now you're asking questions about a patch that I wrote last year and just discovered wasn't merged. I keep on forgetting that Xorg bugzilla is where patches go to die. ;) Yep, that's seems reasonable. Expect a v2 shortly, this time with a tag in the subject. Ross _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
