Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> writes: > Having written the above, I wonder if the first argument should be a struct > xcb_extension_t instead of a major number. I think that this would be the > first > function to use a major number like this and it is trivial for the > implementation to turn the xcb_extension_t into a major number.
That's a good change, removing a bit of code an a few variables from each call site. > Oh and: Could you please add if(!se) return; to this function? This could > simplify the error handling of library users. Sure. > > With this change applied: > > Stop listening for a special event. This undoes the effect of > xcb_register_for_special_xge(). > @param c The xcb connection. > @param se A value returned from xcb_register_for_special_xge(). NULL is > allowed -- [email protected]
pgpPu9vvZ1SJw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
