Uli Schlachter <[email protected]> writes: > Could you introduce a new error value for this case, please? It would already > be > quite hard to figure out that the connection was closed due to such an error > and > without a clear error value, it will be quite impossible.
> I don't like this to be a generic error, too. Could this get the same error > value as the above _xcb_conn_shutdown()? Something like > XCB_CONN_CLOSED_FDPASSING_FAILED (no, I don't really like that name a lot, > but I > don't have any better ideas right now). I'm easy; XCB_CONN_CLOSED_FDPASSING_FAILED is fine by me. -- [email protected]
pgprw9a_GsUpF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
