On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:31:00PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 11/26/13 11:50 PM, Ran Benita wrote: > >Hi Gaetan, > > > >On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:02:23PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > >>On 13-11-26 06:33 PM, Ran Benita wrote: > >>>This was already committed, but how about changing to AC_CC_C99 instead? > >>Pardon me as I am out of context. The xserver module is configured with > >>AC_PROG_CC_C99 that gets pulled in by XORG_DEFAULTS from util-macros. > >>It's not obvious, but it saves from copying this line in the 250 xorg > >>modules. > > > >Problem is, xcb doesn't use util-macros. I like it myself. > > Is it time to start doing so? While xcb has a separate wiki & mailing list, > in many aspects it is an X.Org project these days, and could leverage more of > the shared infrastructure like util-macros to reduce the amount of reinventing > of those macros that needs to happen.
No objection here. As I understand it, you only need util-macros installed when building from git or otherwise autoreconfing, not when building from a "make dist" tarball, right? Given that, I don't see any harm in using it rather than reinventing it. - Josh Triplett _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
