Dave Airlie <[email protected]> writes: > is pScreen->devPrivate guaranteed to be a pixmap, or is that just a > convention?
It's always a pixmap if you use fb: #define fbGetScreenPixmap(s) ((PixmapPtr) (s)->devPrivate) > Do we have anything to say when it is? A driver *not* using fb could put something else there. I think we should probably just declare a PixmapPtr in the screen and be done with it though. > I think I'm also confusing this with the screwed up miScreenInit > private ptr hiding stuff. Agreed. We should just create a new structure to pass the screen init stuff through instead of re-purposing devPrivate. -- [email protected]
pgpJL9Qut_k40.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
