Hi, On 07/15/2014 10:42 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
<snip> >> It might not be strictly harmful in some cases, but it's not the sort of >> thing I want to encourage. 'Always include xorg-server.h before any X >> header ever' is a really simple rule to remember for driver developers; >> muddying the water, particularly when not documented, isn't amazingly >> helpful IMHO. > > Ok, fair enough. I hope someone will get around to fixup drivers where > necessary before the next Fedora mass-rebuild though. If not I guess I > will get to see how bad the driver situation wrt this really is. For starters someone needs to fixup glamor.h, who should I poke for that? Or should xf86-video-ati be fixed to include xorg-server.h before glamor.h ? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel