On 15.07.2014 17:43, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 07/15/2014 10:42 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> It might not be strictly harmful in some cases, but it's not the sort of >>> thing I want to encourage. 'Always include xorg-server.h before any X >>> header ever' is a really simple rule to remember for driver developers; >>> muddying the water, particularly when not documented, isn't amazingly >>> helpful IMHO. >> >> Ok, fair enough. I hope someone will get around to fixup drivers where >> necessary before the next Fedora mass-rebuild though. If not I guess I >> will get to see how bad the driver situation wrt this really is. > > For starters someone needs to fixup glamor.h, who should I poke for that? > > Or should xf86-video-ati be fixed to include xorg-server.h before glamor.h ?
The latter, please. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
