reminder... On 21 October 2014 12:49, Jan Smout <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Keith, we are approaching the one year anniversary of this bug already. > Maybe it is time to finish the patch and leave the issue behind? > > > fyi, I have been running my application with the first version of Jonas's > patch for 65 days straight now without a glitch (it used to crash in less > than 20 hours). > > I also intend to restart this long duration test once the final patch will > be released > > > On 27 September 2014 05:23, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Matt Turner <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Jan Smout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Keith Packard doesn't seem very responsive (as in 'completely ignoring >> the >> >> subject') >> > >> > Perhaps you should try Ccing him? (now Cc'd) >> >> The problem is that reviewing this patch is *really hard*. The last >> time, I think I spent a solid couple of days thinking about this and >> making sure I'd caught all of the cases. I'm still not sure it's right, >> but I guess it's probably better than what we have? >> >> -- >> [email protected] >> > > > > -- > Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part. > -- Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part.
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
